Amanda, one of Abigail's fellow workers at BOSS, was surprised to learn that her department's schedule was changed from a standard 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. day, with an hour for lunch, to a work day that began at 8 a.m. and ended at 6 p.m., and that included a two-hour lunch. BOSS was located in the far suburbs, and there was little Amanda could do during the two-hour lunch period. What especially upset Amanda was the realization that when she got off work at 6 p.m. and drove 30 minutes to pick up her child at day care, she would be at least an hour late for daycare and would have to pay a very costly penalty. There were no day care facilities closer to the job, so Amanda had little recourse. She raised this concern to her supervisor, and when she was told that the new schedules were going to remain 8-6 with a two-hour lunch, Amanda began a campaign to pressure BOSS to change that schedule back. She wrote letters to the local newspaper, and called a local TV station. When Amanda's employer learned of Amanda's actions, it discharged her under Employment at Will (EAW). Amanda filed suit for wrongful discharge, claiming that this was a public policy exception to EAW because it constrained her Constitutional First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech. Which of the following is most correct?

a. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.
b. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge unless the court decides that Amanda had legal standing to bring the case.
c. Amanda will win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge unless the court decides that BOSS had legitimate business necessity for changing the schedule.
d. Amanda will win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.

Question

08-03-2021
Business

Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Amanda, one of Abigail's fellow workers at BOSS, was surprised to learn that her department's schedule was changed from a standard 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. day, with an hour for lunch, to a work day that began at 8 a.m. and ended at 6 p.m., and that included a two-hour lunch. BOSS was located in the far suburbs, and there was little Amanda could do during the two-hour lunch period. What especially upset Amanda was the realization that when she got off work at 6 p.m. and drove 30 minutes to pick up her child at day care, she would be at least an hour late for daycare and would have to pay a very costly penalty. There were no day care facilities closer to the job, so Amanda had little recourse. She raised this concern to her supervisor, and when she was told that the new schedules were going to remain 8-6 with a two-hour lunch, Amanda began a campaign to pressure BOSS to change that schedule back. She wrote letters to the local newspaper, and called a local TV station. When Amanda's employer learned of Amanda's actions, it discharged her under Employment at Will (EAW). Amanda filed suit for wrongful discharge, claiming that this was a public policy exception to EAW because it constrained her Constitutional First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech. Which of the following is most correct?

a. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.
b. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge unless the court decides that Amanda had legal standing to bring the case.
c. Amanda will win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge unless the court decides that BOSS had legitimate business necessity for changing the schedule.
d. Amanda will win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.

Sagot :

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.

Would you pay less for the sofa if you used the coupon ﬁrst or took the 40% discount ﬁrst? 1. coupon ﬁrst by $4.00 2. discount ﬁrst by $12.0 3. coupon ﬁrst by $

I need to find the slope, vertical intercept and horizontal intercept of these 3 linear functions: y=5x-15 y=7-x 4x=2y=12

When an athlete is nearing the end of a race and her cells are low on oxygen, which of the following is likely to occur in her cells so that glycolysis can cont

What is 3 number bymultiplying that equals 14

What is the adjective clause in the sentence? Uncle Don, whom everyone loves to see, is wearing a clown suit to the party. A. to the party B. a clown suit to th

Which sentence contains an adverb clause? A. When do the tryouts for the dance team begin? B. You should mark your calendar for the family picnic next month. C.

Will all the bulbs have the same brightness in a series circuit no matter how many? Does it matter how many bulb there are?

are blue spix macaws cold or warm blooded?

Which of the following statements about matter is true? Mass and matter are always the same. Matter is made up of atoms and has mass. Mass can decrease while ma

According to the scores on the last math test, 80%, or 20, of the students in the class received an A. Find the number of studenin the entire class.

topeadeniran2 topeadeniran2 · Answer 1 · 2021-03-10T03:57:35-05:00

Answer: A. Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.

Explanation:

Based on the information that was provided, Amanda will not win her lawsuit for wrongful discharge.

The employer-at-will simply means that an employer can dismiss his or her worker as long as it's not illegal. In this case, Amanda will not win because she's hired "at will," and in such cases, the courts will deny her any loss claim that results from her dismissal.

Sagot :

Other Questions