Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Suppose that you'd like to find out if a distant star is moving relative to the earth. The star is much too far away to detect any change in its brightness as it moves toward or away from the earth. Instead we can use the Doppler effect to determine its relative speed. For this problem we are going to look at the spectral lines from hydrogen, specifically the one with a wavelength of 656.46 nm.
The hydrogen atoms in a star are also moving at high velocity because of the random motions caused by their high temperature. As a result, each atom is Doppler shifted a little bit differently, leading to a finite width of each spectral line, such as the 656.46-nm line we were just discussing. For a star like our sun, this leads to a finite width of the spectral lines of roughly Δλ=0.04nm.
If our instruments can only resolve to this accuracy, what is the lowest speed V, greater than 0, that we can measure a star to be moving?


Sagot :

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]\bold{18 \ \frac{km}{s}}[/tex]"

Explanation:

Its concern is not whether star speed is significantly lower than the light speed. Taking into consideration the relativistic tempo (small speed star)

[tex]\to \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\lambda} = \frac{v}{c}\\\\\to v = \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\lambda} \left (c \right ) \\\\[/tex]

       [tex]= \left ( \frac{0.04}{656.46} \right ) (3 \times 10^8)\\\\ = 18280 \ \frac{m}{s} \approx 18 \ \frac{km}{s}[/tex]