Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

5. One of the jurors originally felt that the boy was guilty because of the neighborhood that he ha
grown up in. Was this a valid argument 12 angry men


Sagot :

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.