evelynsofia73
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

5. One of the jurors originally felt that the boy was guilty because of the neighborhood that he ha
grown up in. Was this a valid argument 12 angry men

Sagot :

davidpab41

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.