Answered

Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

What is the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment?

Sagot :

Baraq

Answer:

the constitution limits individual rights

Explanation:

The significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment is that "the constitution limits individual rights."

This is because the Supreme Court's translation of the First Amendment in some cases or instances relinquishes individual freedoms in the presence of the need to maintain social order.

This is evident in the case of Schenck v. the United States in the year 1919

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.