Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Ask your questions and receive precise answers from experienced professionals across different disciplines. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

What is the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment?

Sagot :

Baraq

Answer:

the constitution limits individual rights

Explanation:

The significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment is that "the constitution limits individual rights."

This is because the Supreme Court's translation of the First Amendment in some cases or instances relinquishes individual freedoms in the presence of the need to maintain social order.

This is evident in the case of Schenck v. the United States in the year 1919

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.