Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
Original diameter of the sample = 10 mm
Diameter increases by 0.4 mm
It means that the New diameter[tex]= 10+0.4 = 10.4 mm[/tex]
The change in diameter = new diameter - original diameter [tex]= (10.4 - 10) mm[/tex]
Transverse strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ diameter }{original \ diameter}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{(10.4 - 10) }{10}[/tex]
= 0.04 mm
Original height = 3 mm
Reduction in the height = 20%
New height = [tex]3 -( 3*20) mm= 2.4 mm[/tex]
Change in height = new height - original height
[tex]= (2.4 - 3) mm[/tex]
Longitudinal strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ height }{original \ height}[/tex]
[tex]=\dfrac{(2.4 - 3)}{3}[/tex]
= - 0.2 mm
Now;
Poisson’s ratio of sample = [tex]- \dfrac{transverse \ strain }{ longitudinal \ strain}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{- (0.04) }{ (-0.2)}[/tex]
= 0.2
From the given statement, Poisson’s ratio of sample is less than 0.1
However, in the estimation of our data, it is 0.2
This implies that It fails the screening test.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.