Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
Original diameter of the sample = 10 mm
Diameter increases by 0.4 mm
It means that the New diameter[tex]= 10+0.4 = 10.4 mm[/tex]
The change in diameter = new diameter - original diameter [tex]= (10.4 - 10) mm[/tex]
Transverse strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ diameter }{original \ diameter}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{(10.4 - 10) }{10}[/tex]
= 0.04 mm
Original height = 3 mm
Reduction in the height = 20%
New height = [tex]3 -( 3*20) mm= 2.4 mm[/tex]
Change in height = new height - original height
[tex]= (2.4 - 3) mm[/tex]
Longitudinal strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ height }{original \ height}[/tex]
[tex]=\dfrac{(2.4 - 3)}{3}[/tex]
= - 0.2 mm
Now;
Poisson’s ratio of sample = [tex]- \dfrac{transverse \ strain }{ longitudinal \ strain}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{- (0.04) }{ (-0.2)}[/tex]
= 0.2
From the given statement, Poisson’s ratio of sample is less than 0.1
However, in the estimation of our data, it is 0.2
This implies that It fails the screening test.
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.