Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
Original diameter of the sample = 10 mm
Diameter increases by 0.4 mm
It means that the New diameter[tex]= 10+0.4 = 10.4 mm[/tex]
The change in diameter = new diameter - original diameter [tex]= (10.4 - 10) mm[/tex]
Transverse strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ diameter }{original \ diameter}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{(10.4 - 10) }{10}[/tex]
= 0.04 mm
Original height = 3 mm
Reduction in the height = 20%
New height = [tex]3 -( 3*20) mm= 2.4 mm[/tex]
Change in height = new height - original height
[tex]= (2.4 - 3) mm[/tex]
Longitudinal strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ height }{original \ height}[/tex]
[tex]=\dfrac{(2.4 - 3)}{3}[/tex]
= - 0.2 mm
Now;
Poisson’s ratio of sample = [tex]- \dfrac{transverse \ strain }{ longitudinal \ strain}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{- (0.04) }{ (-0.2)}[/tex]
= 0.2
From the given statement, Poisson’s ratio of sample is less than 0.1
However, in the estimation of our data, it is 0.2
This implies that It fails the screening test.
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.