Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
1. It should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. There are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but I can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.
2. Yes. First, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. The pros involve better medical treatment. The cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. Looking at DNA markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. And OK, actually I suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency.
Brainliest pleaseeeee??
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.