Answered

Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Which of the following arguments can be used to correctly defend the WTO’s position on retaliatory tariffs? Check all that apply. A countervailing duty protects import-competing producers. Convincing the government to impose antidumping duties is less costly than facing fair competition. Accusing foreign firms of dumping is less costly than producing goods competitively.

Sagot :

anthougo

Answer:

The arguments that can be used to correctly defend the WTO's position on retaliatory tariffs are:

Convincing the government to impose antidumping duties is less costly than facing fair competition.

Accusing foreign firms of dumping is less costly than producing goods competitively.

Explanation:

A government can impose anti-dumping duties on certain imports when it believes that the prices of the imports are below their fair market values.  Truly, some exports have been found to export goods at prices significantly below their domestic market prices.  Dumping shows that the export prices may even be below their production costs.

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.