Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Discovering a major problem at work, Doug called Joan and discussed the problem with her at length. A few minutes later, his coworker Latesha called him, and Doug told Latesha about the problem. Later, Doug told a friend that Joan had said that fixing the problem would cost $10,000. But later when he looked at his handwritten notes of the two phone conversations, Doug discovered that Latesha, not Joan, had actually made the remark. The contradiction between what really happened and Doug's memory can best be explained by:

Sagot :

ogorwyne

Answer:

Source confusion

Explanation:

Source confusion in psychology is an issue of misattribution. This is a situation whereby a person remembers information correctly but they attribute this information to the wrong person. From this question, Doug is wrongly saying that Joan was the one whoade the remark about the problem costing 10000 dollars meanwhile latesha was the one who said this.

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.