Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

CU
Which of the following is not an argument in favor of drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)?
A) New oil facilities will bring jobs and money to Alaska.
B) The land area affected will be small relative to the total area.
C) The oil will help the United States become less dependent on imported oil.
D) Developing domestic oil reserves will reduce the cost of oil.
E) Money from exported oil could be used to benefit the refuge's wildlife conservation efforts.

Sagot :

Baraq

Answer:

B) The land area affected will be small relative to the total area.

Explanation:

Given that the argument in favor is generally referred to as advantages it provides.

Hence, in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), and considering the available options.

The correct answer is "The land area affected will be small relative to the total area."

This is because the statement is not an advantage of drilling oil, but rather just a statement.

Answer:

C) The US needs to be less dependent on foreign oil.

Explanation:

edge 2021

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.