Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case?
A. A slave who moved to a free state is considered a citizen.
B. A slave who moved to a free state is not a citizen.
C. A slave had the right to sue in U.S. courts.
D. Slave owners could not transport slaves beyond state lines.

Sagot :

Answer:

Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States;

A Missouri slave sued for his freedom, claiming that his four year stay in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory made free land by the Missouri Compromise had made him a free man. The U.S, Supreme Court decided he couldn't sue in federal court because he was property, not a citizen.

Explanation: im pretty sure its A.

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.