At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Get detailed answers to your questions from a community of experts dedicated to providing accurate information. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
The case originated in Cleveland, Ohio, when police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of obscene pictures in Mapp's basement. Mapp was arrested for possessing the pictures, and was convicted in an Ohio court. Mapp argued that her Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the search, and eventually took her appeal to United States Supreme Court. At the time of the case unlawfully seized evidence was banned from federal courts but not state courts, so no. The police officers should have had proper training and a proper warrant that clearly shows the person was a suspect.
Answer:
I think it is true because:
the local security system is under the control of the government so if they try to do something without a warrant they are passing their limits
a warrant is a permeation from the government to arrest someone or investigate.
Explanation:
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.