Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

How would you respond if there was a threat to the freedoms you wish don't get taken away? I give Brainliest!

Sagot :

Answer:

I would speak out against the government, because people are the same towards God and we should be treated as you would want to be treated.

Explanation:

give brainliest

Answer: Either absolute in this instance is, perhaps, equally terrible. The complete lack of freedom makes you a machine. You don't choose anything. Anything at all. If you don't have freedom, that is. Every thought and form of expression is already chosen by some other entity.

Likewise, absolute freedom is no different than absolute chaos. If anything goes, nothing matters. So, in some sense, nobody really has any freedom because their desires are potentially meaningless to everyone else around them.

To have no freedom though is to take away the very aspect that makes us human: the ability to create something, anything. Create a thought, which creates an idea, which creates words, which create actions, which create, eventually, create your character and personality. To lack freedom of thought is to be denied of all that which follows.

Look around you, too. Those with less freedom tend to be miserable. They do much more that they have to rather than what they want to. Similarly, look at people who have too much freedom: they don't really have an incentive to care about the freedoms of others because there are very little to no repercussions for their poor behavior.

Explanation: I have never wrote something like this before but this is honestly how I felt. Sorry it's a little long.