Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Some people worry that government is playing too big of a role in peopleʼs lives and therefore, shouldnʼt be responsible for decisions about what people eat. For example, the former Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, wanted to limit the sizes of sugary drinks in New York City. Do you think the government should step in and set limits, or leave it up to the public to decide what to consume?

Sagot :

MurphyJess111

Answer:

Based on what you're saying, 'limit the sizes of sugary drinks', 'decide what to consume', and things like that, I'd have to say:

On these kind of things, it's up to the people what they want to do. If they want to consume all the soda in the world, that's their choice. Not mine, not their friends, and certainly not the government.

Explanation:

brihannaaa

Answer:

What many think about this problem is the government should step in and set limits to help future health problems/risks in the future. This will allow the government to spend less money on the health risks that come with not setting a limit of what you're consuming.

Explanation:

This is what I would put just tell me if I answered it wrong and I will re do it

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.