Answered

Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

In 2001, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled to accept evidence in a trial that was obtained by recording a phone conversation without a warrant.
Which of these is most directly affected by this ruling?
O protection against unreasonable search and seizure
O consent of the governed
Oright to trial by a jury of one's peers
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus

Sagot :

Baraq

Answer:

The answer is below.

Explanation:

Considering the scenario described in the question, the most directly affected by this ruling is "protection against unreasonable search and seizure"

This is because the approval of a Supreme Court to an issue of obtaining or recording a phone conversation without a warrant will directly affect the individual's protection against the unreasonable search of and seizure of things.

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.