Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

In 2001, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled to accept evidence in a trial that was obtained by recording a phone conversation without a warrant.
Which of these is most directly affected by this ruling?
O protection against unreasonable search and seizure
O consent of the governed
Oright to trial by a jury of one's peers
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus

Sagot :

Baraq

Answer:

The answer is below.

Explanation:

Considering the scenario described in the question, the most directly affected by this ruling is "protection against unreasonable search and seizure"

This is because the approval of a Supreme Court to an issue of obtaining or recording a phone conversation without a warrant will directly affect the individual's protection against the unreasonable search of and seizure of things.

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.