ariannah207
Answered

Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Do you think restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over fails the strict scrutiny test for
equal protection under the law? Why or why not?

Sagot :

Answer: No

Explanation: Strict scrutiny will often be invoked in an equal protection claim. For a court to apply strict scrutiny, the legislature must either have passed a law that infringes upon a fundamental right or involves a suspect classification. Suspect classifications include race, national origin, religion, and alienage.

adefioyelaoye

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over doesn't fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law.

What is Strict scrutiny test?

This is defined as a form of  judicial review employed by courts to ascertain the constitutionality of laws.

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over doesn't fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law because there is no human right infringement and it's applicable to all gender, race etc.

Read more about Strict scrutiny test here https://brainly.com/question/14826245

#SPJ2

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.