Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Mount Snow Inc.
a. Mount Snow would emphasize cost-plus pricing and not target costing. The target costing considered the investors expected returns on investment. Based on the target returns, customers were then charged any fee to meet the target profit, including all other costs. Now that Mount Snow is a price-taker, it cannot meet the target returns. It can only work with the cost-plus pricing strategy in order to rein in its costs.
b. As a price-taker, Mount Snow cannot charge more than $66. It should charge $66.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Investors expected return on investment = 15%
Cost of investment = $115,000,000
Ski Season's Fixed costs = $43,500,000
No of skiers and snowboarders served = 900,000
Variable costs per guest = $10
Charges by other resorts in the vicinity = $66 per lift ticket
Total expected revenue $59,400,000 ($66 * 900,000)
Total variable costs = $9,000,000
Fixed costs = 43,500,000
Total costs = $52,500,000
Profit = $6,900,000
Target profit = $17,250,000 ($115,000,000 * 15%)
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.