Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

JUUL claimed that their product helped people quit smoking, even though there was no independent research to back that up. This is an example of...

Sagot :

crysstalrose1512
This is an example of liability

JUUL is an example of Strict Products Liability as it is not good for fitness and may cause several health issues.

  1. Arguments associated with the faulty nature of JUUL include: JUUL Labs did not well warn customers of the dangers of the use of JUUL products.
  2. The business enterprise did not offer ok commands for secure use of the products, and. While the long-time period aspect results of vaping are not nicely-known.

Why Juul should not be consumed?

Juul and different e-cigarettes were related to severe fitness problems, which include excessive lung injuries, seizures, nicotine dependency, poisoning, and improved danger of coronary heart assaults and strokes.

Thus it is clear that Juul is an example of  Strict Products Liability.

To learn more about the JUUL  refer to the link :

https://brainly.com/question/13503697

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.