Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Part a:
Since the calculated z= 8.1649 falls in the critical region z < ± 1.28 we reject H0 and conclude that the assembly time using the new method is faster.
Part b:
P (Type II Error)= 0.6628
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and alternate hypothesis are
H0: μ1 ≥ μ2 against the claim Ha: μ1 < μ2
This is left tailed test
The critical region for this test at 0.10 ∝ is z < ± 1.28
The test statistic
z= x1-x2/ s/√n
z= 66-61/ 3/√24
z= 5/0.61238
z= 8.16486
Since the calculated z= 8.1649 falls in the critical region z < ± 1.28 we reject H0 and conclude that the assembly time using the new method is faster.
Part b:
P (Type II Error) = P ( accept H0/ H0 is false)
z ( ∝)= X-u/s/√n
1.28= X-61/0.61238
X= 61.7838
So I will incorrectly fail to reject the null as long as a draw a sample mean that greater than 61.7838
The probability of a Type II error is given by
P (z> 61.7838-66/24)
P (z>- 0.42161)
From the tables
P (z>- 0.42161)= 0.6628
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.