Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Eva is showing her work in simplifying (7.3 − 7.2) − 3.8 + 3.7. In which step did Eva make an error?

Step 1: (7.3 − 7.2) − 3.8 + 3.7

Step 2: 7.3 + (−7.2 − 3.8) + 3.7 (commutative property)

Step 3: 7.3 − 11 + 3.7

Step 4: 7.3 + 3.7 − 11 (commutative property)

Step 5: 11 − 11 = 0

Step 2; she wrote commutative instead of distributive
Step 4; she wrote commutative instead of distributive
Step 4; she wrote commutative instead of associative
Step 2; she wrote commutative instead of associative

Sagot :

Lanuel

Answer:

Step 2; she wrote commutative instead of associative.

Explanation:

An associative property of addition is a rule that states that, the sum of three (3) or more numbers will always be the same irrespective of how these numbers are grouped.

This ultimately implies that, re-grouping three (3) or more numbers and adding them will give the same answer or end result (outcome).

Mathematically, the associative property of addition is given by the formula;

[tex] a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c [/tex]

Applying the above rule to the question, we have;

[tex] (7.3 - 7.2) - 3.8 + 3.7 = 7.3 + (-7.2 - 3.8) + 3.7 [/tex]

Hence, we would have the correct step written as;

Step 2: 7.3 + (-7.2 − 3.8) + 3.7 (associative property of addition).

In conclusion, Eva should have written associative property in Step 2 instead of commutative property.

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.