Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

need help asap WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

A researcher reported the results from a particular experiment to the scientist who conducted it. The report states that on one specific part of the experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.18. Based on this p-value, what should the scientist conclude?

The test was not statistically significant because 2 × 0.18 = 0.36, which is less than 0.5.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 18% of the time.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 82% of the time.
The test was statistically significant because a p-value of 0.18 is greater than a significance level of 0.05.
The test was statistically significant because p = 1 − 0.18 = 0.82, which is greater than a significance level of 0.05.

Sagot :

paige33359

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it wrong but it showed me the right answer so, yea

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.