Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

need help asap WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

A researcher reported the results from a particular experiment to the scientist who conducted it. The report states that on one specific part of the experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.18. Based on this p-value, what should the scientist conclude?

The test was not statistically significant because 2 × 0.18 = 0.36, which is less than 0.5.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 18% of the time.
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 82% of the time.
The test was statistically significant because a p-value of 0.18 is greater than a significance level of 0.05.
The test was statistically significant because p = 1 − 0.18 = 0.82, which is greater than a significance level of 0.05.

Sagot :

paige33359

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it wrong but it showed me the right answer so, yea

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.