Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

The passage below describes a U.S. Supreme Court decision In 1940, the Texas Democratic Party refused to give an African American man a ballot to select candidates to run for Congress and governor. In finding this action unconstitutional "… this Court is not constrained to follow a previous decision which…, involves the application of a constitutional principle, rather than an interpretation of the Constitution to evolve the principle itself." Source: Smith v. Allwright (1944) What does this court decision illustrate? (Hard)

Sagot :

annyksl

Answer:

This decision illustrates that the court has the right to review any judicial decision.

Explanation:

One of the most well-known powers that is attributed to the Supreme Court is the ability to judicially review any act, considered unconstitutional, that is not written in the federal constitution. This power is being illustrated in the text above.

This is because the text shows how the supreme court, judicially revised the decision that the black population could receive ballots to cast votes for candidates for governor. The supreme court states that the inclusion of the black vote is not described in the constitution and for that reason, the black people 's voting permission may undergo judicial review.

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.