Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

LINKS WILL BE REPORTED BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
(2 QUESTIONS)

1. Describe the main idea of the document. Summarize in 4-5 sentences.

2. How does the evidence from Document 1 support or (refute) that the Mongols may not have been or were indeed "barbaric"? Describe positive and negative factors of ruling a large empire. You can also include what you've learned so far about the Mongols.


LINKS WILL BE REPORTED BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT 2 QUESTIONS 1 Describe The Main Idea Of The Document Summarize In 45 Sentences 2 How Does The Evidence From Documen class=

Sagot :

Answer:

The vikings were barbaric as they arrived on ships and slaughtered as many people as they could and control in power. Although the mongolians could be refrenced the same as they also like the vikings take countries for power resulting in death.

Explanation: