Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Experience the ease of finding accurate answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Last year there was a pandemic caused by xyz virus in the city of Abc. The population of the city is 15 million. The health authorities of the city are estimating that more than 3% of the people of this city were infected by this virus. In order to test this statement, they collected a sample of 1000 individuals of this city and conducted an antibody test on them. The results of the analysis showed that 40 individuals out of those 1000 people got infected during the pandemic. Is there evidence to support that more than 3% of the population of the city got infected by the virus? Use hypothesis testing.

Sagot :

fichoh

Answer:

There is significant evidence to support that more than 3% of the population of the city got infected by the virus.

Step-by-step explanation:

x = 40 ; n = 1000

phat = x / n = 40 / 1000 = 0.04 = 4%

H0 : p = 0.3

H1 : p > 0.3

The test statistic :

(Phat - P) ÷ √(p(1 - p) / n)

1 - p = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7

(0.4 - 0.3) ÷ √(0.3(0.7) / 1000)

0.1 ÷ 0.0144913

= 6.9

Pvalue ; Using the Pvalue from Zstatistic calculator :

Pvalue < 0.00001

Reject H0, if Pvalue < α

0.00001 < α ; We reject H0 ; Hence, there is significant evidence to support that more than 3% of the population of the city got infected by the virus.

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.