zs12279
Answered

Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. The high court said evidence seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

CAN YOU PUT THIS IN YOUR OWN WORDS??
No links or spam i will report. TY!

Sagot :

bunmiakinola71121

Answer:

The case originated in Cleveland, Ohio when police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of obscene pictures in Mapp's basement. Mapp was arrested for possessing the pictures and was convicted in an Ohio court. Mapp argued that her Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the search, and eventually took her appeal to United States Supreme Court. At the time of the case unlawfully seized evidence was banned from federal courts but not state courts.

Explanation:

Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.