Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer: I’m honestly not surprised because it definitely seems like a very one sided decision. The United States Supreme Court was presented with an opportunity to correct the error of their ruling in Roe. Instead, the Court arrogantly chose to maintain their position in an all too common case of “repeat judicial activism.” In the courtroom, decisions are too often guided – not by legislation – but rather by so-called “case-law,” i.e., past court decisions, or precedent. This adherence to “precedent” is said to provide consistency and uniformity among the numerous courts of the United States. However, blind adherence to bad precedents results in the “consistent and uniform” multiplication of bad results.
Explanation:
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.