Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

By law, an industrial plant can discharge no more than 500 gallons of waste water per hour, on the average, into a neighboring lake. Based on other infractions they have noticed, an environmental action group believes this limit is being exceeded. Monitoring the plant is expensive, and a random sample of four hours is selected over a period of a week. Software reports:
Variable No. Cases Mean SD SE of Mean
WASTE 4 1000.0 400.0 200.0
(a) Test whether the mean discharge equals 500 gallons per hour against the alternative that the limit is being exceeded. Find the P-valuc and interpret.
(b) Explain why the test may be highly approximate or even invalid if the population distribution of discharge is far from normal.
(c) Explain how your one-sided analysisimplicitly tests the broader null hypothesis that µ <>

Sagot :

fichoh

Answer:

P = 0.0438 ; We reject the Null and conclude that there is significant evidence that the discharge limit per gallon of waste has been exceeded.

Due to the small sample size.

Step-by-step explanation:

H0: μ = 500

H1 : μ > 500

Test statistic :

(xbar - μ) / S.E

Tstatistic = (1000 - 500) / 200

= 500 / 200

= 2.5

Pvalue from Test score ; df = 4 - 1 = 3 ; using calculator :

Pvalue = 0.0438

At α = 0.05

Pvalue < α ; We reject the Null and conclude that there is significant evidence that the discharge limit per gallon of waste has been exceeded.

The test above has a very small sample size, and for a distribution to be approximately Normal, the sample size must be sufficiently large enough according to the Central limit theorem.

For a two sided analysis ; the Pvalue is twice that for the one sided, hence, Pvalue = (0.0438 * 2) = 0.0876 yielding a less strong evidence against the Null.