Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.
*And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job...
~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)
*And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job...
~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.