MelodiMick
Answered

Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Take a look at the statement below: Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. How could this statement be revised to make it a hypothesis? Fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. Fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural. Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer. Plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.

Sagot :

meerkat18
The question is asking to state which of the following is the revised statement that would make the sentence as a hypothesis, base on my research and analysis, I would say that the answer would be "Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer" 

The correct answer is that Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.

The hypothesis that Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizer. The revised statement to this hypothesis could explain the effect of fish meal which affects the plant in a better way when compared to artificial fertilizers. The plants fed with fish meal will grow taller than plants that are fed with artificial fertilizer.

We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.