Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Both Goldsmith and Swift condemned the evils of their age, but they often attacked different vices and used different approaches in doing so.

Instructions:
Write an essay of at least 900 words comparing (finding similarities) or contrasting (finding differences in) their approach to social criticism.
1. Begin your paper with one statement that summarizes how these two authors are being compared or contrasted (a thesis statement).
2.Follow this introduction with your supporting argument made up of reasons and examples to make the comparison or contrast clear.
3.Before you begin to write your own paper, write an outline using one of the following methods of organization:
Arrange your argument by points of comparison (or contrast). For example, if you decide that both authors are alike in their condemnation of stray dogs and lice, you will first discuss how Swift deals with dogs; then, how Goldsmith does. After that point is dealt with, you will discuss how Swift deals with lice; and then, how Goldsmith does. This approach is called an alternating method.
Collect your data and present it in chart form such as a bar graph or a Venn diagram (as shown below) showing differences and similarities.
4.Pay close attention to paragraph and sentence structure.

Sagot :

Explanation:

Although Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith have two distinct writing styles, their passion for literature, their desire for a better world, and the underlying topic of their work are all strikingly similar. The lives of these two famous authors also resemble each other’s, starting in poverty, living through life’s hardships, and ending in success. Swift and Goldsmith were two of the most famous authors of the 18th century. I believe if Swift and Goldsmith had met, they would have made great friends. For the reason that, along with their passions, their lives were bursting with challenges. Both were born in poverty and underwent numerous challenges, including the death of loved ones and the loss of purpose in life. In addition They criticized the social injustices that was going on during the 18th century in Ireland by doing what they loved the most, writing. Swift and Goldsmith wrote their stories as a mockery to the arrogance, hypocrisy, and falsehood of the upper classes. Through their bold and amusing tales, we are entertained with the obvious message of injustice and corruption decorated in a satire. Through their love of literature, Swift and Goldsmith, tried to better their society by displaying their discontent through countless satires. For both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith, their love of literature began at a young age; however, their poverty-stricken lives prevented them from pursuing their dreams. Nevertheless, these dreams manifested into reality, and soon Swift and Goldsmith took jobs writing for the Tory. Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith had similar ideas, and because of this, took on similar writing jobs. Their love of literature persuaded each to join a Literary Club. Throughout the years, these two poets underwent great trials; however, their passion for literature never. It was their greatest weapon against injustice, and this fact remains true today. A person’s tongue is sharper than any double-edged sword. It can start a war, just as easily as it can prevent one. With Jonathan Swift’s and Oliver Goldsmith’s similar ideas, they tried to portray the injustice and corruption of the upper classes through satire poetry. Their desire in life was to ease their own poverty and to instruct and please the reading public through their literary masterpieces. Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith had a similar vision for the future: a world without poverty, where justice was prevalent, and the masses were educated. This ideal world cannot be accomplished through government alone; the moral of the people has to change as well. Swift and Goldsmith both recognized this problem, therefore they wrote to the people, not the upper classmen that they distrusted. Both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith skillfully portrayed their distrust for the wealthy members of Parliament and the upper class, while displaying their desires for a better world,

Answer: THIS IS THE FULL ESSAY, I PAID FOR IT SO YOU DON'T HAVE TOO :)))

Explanation:

Although Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith have two distinct writing styles, their passion for literature, their desire for a better world, and the underlying topic of their work are all strikingly similar. The lives of these two famous authors also resemble each other’s, starting in poverty, living through life’s hardships, and ending in success. Swift and Goldsmith were two of the most famous authors of the 18th century. I believe if Swift and Goldsmith had met, they would have made great friends. For the reason that, along with their passions, their lives were bursting with challenges. Both were born in poverty and underwent numerous challenges, including the death of loved ones and the loss of purpose in life. In addition, Jonathan Swift inspired Oliver Goldsmith to pursue his writing career. However, if Jonathan Swift had had the opportunity to read Oliver Goldsmith’s poetry, he would have disliked his artistic style. For the only reason being, Swift did not like elaborate poetic diction. Although these 18th century satirists express their opinions in different ways, they have the same love of literature, a similar dream for the future, and they both utilize satires to convey the evils they perceive in society.

Through their mutual love of the literary arts, both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith were satirists of social issues. They criticized the social injustices that was going on during the 18th century in Ireland by doing what they loved the most, writing. Swift and Goldsmith wrote their stories as a mockery to the arrogance, hypocrisy, and falsehood of the upper classes. Through their bold and amusing tales, we are entertained with the obvious message of injustice and corruption decorated in a satire. Through their love of literature, Swift and Goldsmith, tried to better their society by displaying their discontent through countless satires. For both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith, their love of literature began at a young age; however, their poverty-stricken lives prevented them from pursuing their dreams. Nevertheless, these dreams manifested into reality, and soon Swift and Goldsmith took jobs writing for the Tory. Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith had similar ideas, and because of this, took on similar writing jobs. Their love of literature persuaded each to join a Literary Club. Throughout the years, these two poets underwent great trials; however, their passion for literature never wavered.

Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith portrayed their desires through their love of literature. It was their greatest weapon against injustice, and this fact remains true today. A person’s tongue is sharper than any double-edged sword. It can start a war, just as easily as it can prevent one. With Jonathan Swift’s and Oliver Goldsmith’s similar ideas, they tried to portray the injustice and corruption of the upper classes through satire poetry. Their desire in life was to ease their own poverty and to instruct and please the reading public through their literary masterpieces. Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith had a similar vision for the future: a world without poverty, where justice was prevalent, and the masses were educated. This ideal world cannot be accomplished through government alone; the moral of the people has to change as well. Swift and Goldsmith both recognized this problem, therefore they wrote to the people, not the upper classmen that they distrusted. Both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith skillfully portrayed their distrust for the wealthy members of Parliament and the upper class, while displaying their desires for a better world, in their writings. Despite their shared hardships, both Swift and Goldsmith never lost their hope for a brighter future.

The content found within Swift’s and Goldsmith’s works varies, but the subject is always constant: mockery of a prestigious member of society, begging for reform, through the use of a satire. Both Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith had strong political viewpoints, and both preferred a strong monarchy in place of the corrupt members of Parliament. However popular their literary pieces became, they failed to bring about a reform in their communities. Regardless of the outcome, these two satirists criticized the social and political issues of their communities, without fear of persecution or judgement. Their boldness throughout their lives help to promote their careers as writers and poets. They used their growing popularity to reach more people with their message of reform.