Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Discover in-depth solutions to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Book Values versus Market Values In preparing a balance sheet, why do you think standard accounting practice focuses on historical cost rather than market value

Sagot :

eooyibo123

Answer:

Historical costs is objectively and precisely measured, whereas market values can be difficult to estimate, and different analysts would come up with different

values.

Explanation:

In preparing a balance sheet it is customary for a company to value the assets and other items based on historical costs rather than market values.

For example if an asset is purchased at $20,000, this value will reflect in the balance sheet in subsequent years. Or future calculation will be based on this.

Let's say yearly depreciation is $1,000 then after on year the value will be $19,000, after two years $18,000 and so on.

This is more object than market value which varies at any one time.

Market value for an item will vary depending on location and the market.

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.