Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Book Values versus Market Values In preparing a balance sheet, why do you think standard accounting practice focuses on historical cost rather than market value

Sagot :

eooyibo123

Answer:

Historical costs is objectively and precisely measured, whereas market values can be difficult to estimate, and different analysts would come up with different

values.

Explanation:

In preparing a balance sheet it is customary for a company to value the assets and other items based on historical costs rather than market values.

For example if an asset is purchased at $20,000, this value will reflect in the balance sheet in subsequent years. Or future calculation will be based on this.

Let's say yearly depreciation is $1,000 then after on year the value will be $19,000, after two years $18,000 and so on.

This is more object than market value which varies at any one time.

Market value for an item will vary depending on location and the market.

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.