Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Megan, a resident of New York, runs a red light in Texas and hits Sarah, a Texas resident. Sarah files suit against Megan. The Texas court can exercise jurisdiction over Megan based on: a. maximum contacts statute. b. out-of-state jurisdiction statute. c. the long arm statute. d. legitimate contacts statute.

Sagot :

vaduz

Answer:

c. The Long Arm Statute.

Explanation:

The legal jurisdiction "Long Arm Statute" refers to the liberty of a state to have jurisdiction against an out-of-state defendant in a legal case. In other words, this statute means that a state has the right to persecute an out-of-state offender who commits the offense in the visiting state. Simply put, the state has a long arm to reach other states and bring the offenders to court.

In the given scenario, Megan is from New York but commits the offense of running a red light and hitting Sarah while in Texas. So, when Sarah files the lawsuit against Megan, the state of Texas can exercise the "Long Arm Statute" against Megan and persecute her despite being a New York citizen and not a Texas resident.

Thus, the correct answer is option c.

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.