Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across different disciplines on our comprehensive platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

A local police chief claims that about 51% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted. A sample of 900 arrests shows that 47% of the arrests were prosecuted. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to refute the chief's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.

Sagot :

Answer:

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_0: p = 0.51[/tex].

The alternate hypothesis is [tex]H_1: p \neq 0.51[/tex].

The p-value of the test is 0.0164 > 0.01, which means that there is not sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to refute the chief's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

A local police chief claims that about 51% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 51%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.51[/tex]

At the alternate hypothesis, we test if the proportion is different from 51%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p \neq 0.51[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.51 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.51, \sigma = \sqrt{0.51*0.49}[/tex]

A sample of 900 arrests shows that 47% of the arrests were prosecuted.

This means that [tex]n = 900, X = 0.47[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.47 - 0.51}{\frac{\sqrt{0.51*0.49}}{\sqrt{900}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -2.4[/tex]

P-value of the test:

Probability that the sample proportion differs from 0.51 by at least 0.04, which is P(|z|>2.4), which is 2 multiplied by the p-value of Z = -2.4.

Looking at the z-table, the Z = -2.4 has a p-value of 0.0082.

2*0.0082 = 0.0164.

The p-value of the test is 0.0164 > 0.01, which means that there is not sufficient evidence at the 0.01 level to refute the chief's claim.

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.