Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

A town passes a law banning political protests within town limits. Some of the town’s residents file a court case against the town government, arguing that their constitutional rights have been violated. Which of the following provides the best supporting evidence for their case?
A. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

B. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . .”

C. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

D. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Sagot :

Answer:

A. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Explanation:

The best supporting evidence is that the government has made no law favoring any religion or prohibiting its exercise, stopping people from freedom of speech, or preventing them from peaceful assembling in any place.

Option A is the correct answer.

What are human rights?

Human rights are the basic rights that are provided to each and every citizen of the country since their childhood.

The constitution has no right where it favors or prohibits any particular religion or caste, or no right where it stops the citizens of the country from putting their own opinions or point of view, or no right where it prevents the people to have a peaceful assembly.

Therefore, the act of banning political interests is totally against the rights of the constitution.

Learn more about the constitution in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/14925195

#SPJ2

Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.