Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer: 318
===============================================
Explanation:
Refer to the diagram below. Notice how I've formed 3 rectangles underneath the curve. The term "right Riemann sum" refers to the idea of making each rectangle's upper right corner be on the curve. The upper left corner spills over top, meaning we have an over-estimate going on here.
Simply find the area of each rectangle, and then add up those sub areas. That will get you to the final answer.
Note how we go from x = -1 to x = 5, which is a distance of 5-(-1) = 6 units. Split three ways and each interval is 6/3 = 2 units wide.
If we started at x = -1, then increasing 2 units leads us to x = -1+2 = 1 as the first x input we compute into f(x). This is the height of the first rectangle.
Then 1+2 = 3 is the next input, meaning f(3) is the height of the next rectangle, and so on. We keep going until all rectangles are accounted for.
----------------------
You should have these rectangle heights:
- 3
- 29
- 127
when moving from left to right.
They add up to 3+29+127 = 159. Double that to get to the final answer of 2*159 = 318
The formula I'm using is
[tex]\Delta x*(f(x_1) + f(x_2) + \dots f(x_n))[/tex]
where x1,x2,... represents the values 1, 3, and 5. These are the x values plugged into the function to get the corresponding heights (3, 29, 127)
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.