Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

30 POINTS, PLEASE NO SILLY ANSWER!!!
Counter Argument: What would be the main argument of the opposing side?
My argument is: People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 18 because that’s when our minds can start developing, especially with more responsibilities and new experiences.
But what could be a counter-argument to mine?


Sagot :

Answer: People should be granted adult right once they turn 21 because that’s the age when one can purchase alcohol, go to a casino and gamble, receive an adult license, etc.
ItzTds

Counter argument:

Yes, at the age of 18 you probably do get more responsible. But, a lot of minors are out there in the world knowing that these people are making the wrong choice.

They should be able to take part too. Adding on, life is all about learing to push harder and keep on going.

People make mistakes and as a person myself I definetly make a lot of mistakes. But, what if kids were able to learn at a young age. Of course they might make mistakes.

Non the less, that is what life is. If there are to be any trouble the goverment would be able to just stop it, so there is no harm done.

Yes, my oppenent has a point, but to make this world better kids should be able to learn from their mistakes. To know what is wrong and what is right. That will lead out next generation to be better and better as it goes on.