Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

100 POINTS DUM B ANSWER WILL BE REPORTED TO BRAIN LY
Rebuttal this counter-argument: People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 21 or up because they have become mature, physically, and mentally strong.
My argument is People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 18 because that’s when our minds can start developing, especially with more responsibilities and new experiences.

Sagot :

ItzTds

Yeah your argument is correct.

At 18 you can vote, the present-day youth are literate and enlightened and the lowering of the voting age would provide to the unrepresented youth of the country an opportunity to give vent to their feelings and help them become a part of the political process.

It is, therefore, proposed to reduce the voting age from 21 years to 18 years. Hence, the court argument is proved as wrong. 18 have the capability to vote.

Answer:

Explanation:

Your argument is People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 18 because that’s when our minds can start developing, especially with more responsibilities and new experiences.

Rebuttal to your argument and support the original argument of People should attain the legal rights of adulthood at the age of 21 or up because they have become mature, physically, and mentally strong:

At the age of 18, the mind just starts developing. With more responsibilities and new experiences, it can be overwhelming and be influenced by others.  If the mind is allowed to further develop and become more mature at age of 21, it will be able to better handle the responsibilities and rights of adulthood.