An airline passenger nearly killed in a crash is suing the airline for personal injuries. To prove the extent of his injuries, the passenger offers a videotape taken by a local news station immediately after the crash that shows serious burns covering much of the passenger's face. The airline moves to exclude the videotape on grounds that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
In making his ruling, which of the following is NOT appropriate for the judge to consider:
A) The videotape will make it more likely that the passenger will win the suit.
B) There are other methods of proving the passenger's damages.
C) The videotape can be restricted to its proper purpose by instructing the jury to disregard any possible emotional appeal.
D) the videotape will encourage the jury to decide the suit on an emotional basis.

Question

06-06-2021
Social Studies

Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

An airline passenger nearly killed in a crash is suing the airline for personal injuries. To prove the extent of his injuries, the passenger offers a videotape taken by a local news station immediately after the crash that shows serious burns covering much of the passenger's face. The airline moves to exclude the videotape on grounds that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
In making his ruling, which of the following is NOT appropriate for the judge to consider:
A) The videotape will make it more likely that the passenger will win the suit.
B) There are other methods of proving the passenger's damages.
C) The videotape can be restricted to its proper purpose by instructing the jury to disregard any possible emotional appeal.
D) the videotape will encourage the jury to decide the suit on an emotional basis.

Sagot :

We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.

List the three ways in which water reaches the atmosphere and tell which way accounts for most of the water in the atmosphere

QUESTION 7Were sensory memories to last longer than normal, 1.we would need more working memory. 2.our senses would not work together. 3.we would become overloa

Kandace drives 48 miles each way to work.She works 5 days a week.Her car gets 32 miles per gallon of gas.If gas costs $3.79 per gallon, how much does she spend

On average Luis burns about 90 calories for each mile that he jogs.If his typical jogging pace is about 7 minutes per mile, how long will he have to jog in orde

write the simplest form and identify the non-permissible values. 4(x squared-9)squared-(x+3)squared/x squared+6x+9

How many letters are in supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

how do i express the ratio of 300 miles to 4 hours as a unit rate?

what is a group of similar organisms that can mate and its offspring can also reproduce called?

What are the basic structures in which objects are grouped together in space?

Which of the following types of words must be capitalized? The first and last word of every sentence First, last, and main words in a book title All pronouns

Parrain Parrain · Answer 1 · 2021-06-08T21:55:21-04:00

Answer: A) The videotape will make it more likely that the passenger will win the suit.

Explanation:

The fact is that evidence tends to favor one party over the other. The Judge therefore should not begin to consider the likelihood that the videotape would help the passenger win their suit because as said, evidence helps one party over another so the Judge doing this is a fruitless endeavor.

Rather the Judge should focus on deciding if the probative value of the tape is more or less than the danger the video poses of unfair prejudice.

Sagot :

Other Questions