Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Commercial fishing has long been one of the major industries of a coastal state. To protect the fishing industry and to promote the general welfare of the state's citizens, the legislature of the state enacted statutes requiring licenses for commercial fishing. An applicant for the license must pay a $300 fee and establish that he has been engaged in commercial fishing in the waters of the state for 10 years. A commercial fisherman residing in a neighboring state frequently takes his fishing boat up the coast. His favorite spot is approximately two miles off the coast of the legislating state.

If the commercial fisherman challenges the constitutionality of the legislating state's statutes, should the court find the statutes constitutional?
A. Yes, because Congress has not enacted legislation regarding the subject matter of the statutes.
B. Yes, because economic and social regulations are presumed valid.
C. No, because less restrictive means are available.
D. No, because Congress has exclusive power to regulate foreign commerce, which includes commercial ocean fishing.


Sagot :

Answer:

i think its D, sorry if im wrong tho

Explanation:

(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ follow me ♥

˜”*°•.˜”*°• say thank you on profile •°*”˜.•°*”˜

░▒▓█ ℝαte █▓▒░

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.