At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
The answer is "Option b"
Step-by-step explanation:
Through this context, it is determined that the p-value is much less than 0.05, which is 0.021, so the rejection of the null hypothesis at 5%. There should be enough evidence to demonstrate that now the effect of the organization was substantial on how long it has taken to solve the issue. This result is statistically important.
The correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
From the table, we have the following values
F = 4.467
df between group = 2
df within group = 27
To reference the result, we make use of:
F(df between group, df within group) = F value
So, we have:
F(2, 27) = 4.47
The above result shows the F value approximated to two decimal points
Hence, the correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
Read more about APA styles at:
https://brainly.com/question/858964
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.