At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
The answer is "Option b"
Step-by-step explanation:
Through this context, it is determined that the p-value is much less than 0.05, which is 0.021, so the rejection of the null hypothesis at 5%. There should be enough evidence to demonstrate that now the effect of the organization was substantial on how long it has taken to solve the issue. This result is statistically important.
The correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
From the table, we have the following values
F = 4.467
df between group = 2
df within group = 27
To reference the result, we make use of:
F(df between group, df within group) = F value
So, we have:
F(2, 27) = 4.47
The above result shows the F value approximated to two decimal points
Hence, the correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
Read more about APA styles at:
https://brainly.com/question/858964
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.
