Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

State the final conclusion in simple nontechnical terms.
Original claim: The proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.
Initial conclusion: Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Which of the following is the correct conclusion?
A. There is suffficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.
B. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

Sagot :

Answer:

B. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at least 0.6, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \geq 0.6[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of less than 0.6, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.6[/tex]

Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This means that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion is less than 0.6, and thus the correct answer is given by option B.

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.