Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

State the final conclusion in simple nontechnical terms.
Original claim: The proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.
Initial conclusion: Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Which of the following is the correct conclusion?
A. There is suffficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.
B. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

Sagot :

Answer:

B. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proportion of male golfers is less than 0.6.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at least 0.6, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \geq 0.6[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of less than 0.6, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.6[/tex]

Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

This means that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion is less than 0.6, and thus the correct answer is given by option B.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.