Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Which two arguments support loose constructionism?

Sagot :

francocanacari

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.