Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

What are the primary arguments offered for reforming the practice of holding until trial poor individuals charged with a misdemeanor who cannot afford to pay bail

Sagot :

fichoh

Answer:

increased likelihood of conviction

-increased guilty pleas for those kept in jail

-negative effects on their employment

Explanation:

Prior to the prison reform process, an alleged offender is held in custody until trial no matter how long. Therefore, some alleged offenders spend a sizeable number of time in custody before the actual trial begins and judgement is subsequently passed. In other to correct for this unfair treatment, arguments put up include an increasing likelihood of being convicted as they are being treated as convicts, they are no longer afforded the treatment given to a normal individual. The lack of funds gives an increasing likelihood of been pronounced convict. They are also in danger of losing their jobs as they are restricted for going to work and likely to be replaced rendering them enempliyed.

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.