Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
a) 0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
b) 0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
c) 0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
d) None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.
Normal Probability Distribution
Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
The CPA Practice Advisor reports that the mean preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns was $273. Use this price as the population mean and assume the population standard deviation of preparation fees is $100.
This means that [tex]\mu = 273, \sigma = 100[/tex]
A) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that [tex]n = 30, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}[/tex]
The probability is the p-value of Z when X = 273 + 16 = 289 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 273 - 16 = 257. So
X = 289
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
By the Central Limit Theorem
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = 0.88[/tex]
[tex]Z = 0.88[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8106
X = 257
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = -0.88[/tex]
[tex]Z = -0.88[/tex] has a p-value of 0.1894
0.8106 - 0.1894 = 0.6212
0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
B) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that [tex]n = 50, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}[/tex]
X = 289
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
By the Central Limit Theorem
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = 1.13[/tex]
[tex]Z = 1.13[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8708
X = 257
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.13[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.13[/tex] has a p-value of 0.1292
0.8708 - 0.1292 = 0.7416
0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
C) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?
Sample of 30 means that [tex]n = 100, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}[/tex]
X = 289
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
By the Central Limit Theorem
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = 1.6[/tex]
[tex]Z = 1.6[/tex] has a p-value of 0.9452
X = 257
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.6[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.6[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0648
0.9452 - 0.0648 =
0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.
D) Which, if any of the sample sizes in part (a), (b), and (c) would you recommend to ensure at least a .95 probability that the same mean is withing $16 of the population mean?
None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.
C is actually 0.8904
for anybody else stuck on this wondering why cengage is telling you c is wrong
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.
