Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Consider two college roommates, one who smokes and one who does not. The smoker wishes to smoke in the room, and the nonsmoker dislikes smoking in the room. Suppose the smoker would be willing to pay $500 to be allowed to smoke in the room during the semester, and the nonsmoker would be willing to pay $600 to keep the room smoke-free. What should happen in the socially optimal outcome

Sagot :

anthougo

Answer:

The socially optimal outcome is that there will be no smoking in the room.

Explanation:

The above answer is  based on the willingness of the nonsmoker to ensure that no smoking happens in the room.  For instance, the nonsmoker can pay off the smoker, paying $600 to dissuade him from smoking in the room. On the contrary, the smoker is only willing to cough out $500, which is less than $600, in order to smoke in the room. Under social optimality, the nonsmoker wins this game.

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.