At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer:
52, 43
Step-by-step explanation:
the first instinct might be to make the first number as big as possible : 54
that leaves for the second number 2 and 3, and the largest combination here is 32 (larger than 23).
54×32 = 1728
but, the area of a rectangle (and that is what we are calculating here) is the larger, the closer the lengths of its side are.
so, a bigger difference between length and width creates a smaller area, than a smaller difference between length and width for similar lengths.
so, what if we sacrifice just a little bit of the length, and make it 53 ? that opens up 4 for the second number, giving us 42 as width. they are much closer to each other with still very similar length.
53×42 = 2226
you see ? much bigger.
let's experiment further and pick 52 as length.
that gives us 43 as width.
52×43 = 2236
and again a little bit closer and with bigger result.
you see, in the previous case we "added" comparably to this last case a 42 (53×42 instead of 52×42), and in the last case we added a 52 (52×43 instead of 52×42) creating the difference of 10.
but of course, this only works, if we don't decrease the length too much.
Answer:
Using each of the digits 2 through 5 only once, write 2 two-digit whole numbers whose product is as large as possible.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.