Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
52, 43
Step-by-step explanation:
the first instinct might be to make the first number as big as possible : 54
that leaves for the second number 2 and 3, and the largest combination here is 32 (larger than 23).
54×32 = 1728
but, the area of a rectangle (and that is what we are calculating here) is the larger, the closer the lengths of its side are.
so, a bigger difference between length and width creates a smaller area, than a smaller difference between length and width for similar lengths.
so, what if we sacrifice just a little bit of the length, and make it 53 ? that opens up 4 for the second number, giving us 42 as width. they are much closer to each other with still very similar length.
53×42 = 2226
you see ? much bigger.
let's experiment further and pick 52 as length.
that gives us 43 as width.
52×43 = 2236
and again a little bit closer and with bigger result.
you see, in the previous case we "added" comparably to this last case a 42 (53×42 instead of 52×42), and in the last case we added a 52 (52×43 instead of 52×42) creating the difference of 10.
but of course, this only works, if we don't decrease the length too much.
Answer:
Using each of the digits 2 through 5 only once, write 2 two-digit whole numbers whose product is as large as possible.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.