Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Naval architects never claim that a ship is unsinkable, but the sinking of the passenger-and-car ferry Estonia in the Baltic surely should have never have happened. It was well designed and carefully maintained. It carried the proper number of lifeboats. It had been thoroughly inspected the day of its fatal voyage. Yet hours later, Estonia rolled over and sank in a cold, stormy night. It went down so quickly that most of those on board, caught in their dark, flooding cabins, had no chance to save themselves: Of those who managed to scramble overboard, only 139 survived. The rest died of hypothermia before the rescuers could pluck them from the cold sea. The final death toll amounted to 912 souls. However, there was an unpleasant number of questions about why Estonia sank and why so many survivors were men in the prime of life, while most of the dead were women, children and the elderly.
Based on the above passage, fill in the blank.
It is clear from the passage that the survivors of the accident .


Sagot :

Answer: b. were mostly young men but women, children and the elderly stood little chance.

Explanation:

The passage says that the people who survived were men in the prime of their life. Humans are considered to be at the prime of their life when they are young which means that it was mostly young men who survived.

A conclusion that could be drawn is that these young men used their strength to force their selves into the life boats and the elderly, women and children who were not as strong, were simply pushed aside.