Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Answer:
A flaw in the argument is that it:
A. avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal.
Explanation:
The writer of the passage makes his opinion clear: a certain proposal must be abandoned. We would expect him to provide strong, solid reasons for such an opinion, but he fails to do so when he says, "The students . . . will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established." This statement is more of a biased assumption than it is a reason. As a matter of fact, the writer's focus on supporters almost sounds as an attack. He tries to back the statement up with a couple of weak pieces of evidence, mentioning "some" students, "one" student, "several others". But that is far from enough, and it does not even constitute statistical evidence. Simply put, he does not have enough facts, enough evidence to make his opinion and his focus on supporters a solid one.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.