Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students
Which of these arguments provides the weakest support for the Supreme
Court's decision that students have the right to wear the armbands to school?
A. Students at the school were allowed to wear other controversial
symbols.
B. Armbands are a form of expression, even though they don't involve
speech
C. Five previous court cases showed that armbands fall under First
Amendment pro
D. The armbands were not shown to cause disruption or interfere
with learning

Sagot :

DanXO1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

There wasn't any other previous court cases that said that armbands fall under the first amendment.

Armbands are a form of expression, even if they don't involve sppech is a good argument. If students were allowed to wear other controversial things, then why can't armbands be permitted? The armbands didn't cause disruption. All of those are good arguments.

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.