Answered

Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students
Which of these arguments provides the weakest support for the Supreme
Court's decision that students have the right to wear the armbands to school?
A. Students at the school were allowed to wear other controversial
symbols.
B. Armbands are a form of expression, even though they don't involve
speech
C. Five previous court cases showed that armbands fall under First
Amendment pro
D. The armbands were not shown to cause disruption or interfere
with learning

Sagot :

DanXO1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

There wasn't any other previous court cases that said that armbands fall under the first amendment.

Armbands are a form of expression, even if they don't involve sppech is a good argument. If students were allowed to wear other controversial things, then why can't armbands be permitted? The armbands didn't cause disruption. All of those are good arguments.

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.