Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.

We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.