At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.
Explanation:
Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.
In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.