Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.