Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.