Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.