Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

In a civil case John Deer vs. Jane Doe, the judge finds that the jury was swayed by the fact that Jane Doe was a woman when passing the verdict in her favor. Owing to this, the judge reduces the damages awarded to Jane by $20,000. This act is called ________. motion for summary judgment remittitur judgment notwithstanding the verdict motion for judgment on the pleadings

Sagot :

Parrain

Answer: Remittitur

Explanation:

A remittitur refers to an action by a Judge whereby the Judge reduces the amount of money that a Jury recommends that a party in a civil case should be paid as damages.

There are several reasons why a Judge might do this but the most common one is that the amount awarded exceeds the amount asked for. In this case however, it was because the jury was unduly swayed by gender.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.